Skip to content
Daghestanian Rock Lizard (Darevskia daghestanica) — Tusheti; Akhmeta (Tbatana)

Daghestanian Rock Lizard

Darevskia daghestanica

A harmless rock lizard of north-eastern Georgia's mountains. Colour will not separate it from the Caucasian rock lizard.

Tusheti; Akhmeta (Tbatana)Risk to humansHarmless

At a glance

Key facts in one look

Habitat

Tusheti / Tbatana

Length

SVL ~4.4–5.8 cm

Venom

None — harmless

Conservation

IUCN LC

Checklist

Confirmed

Family

Lacertidae

Human interaction: It has no venom and is not dangerous to people. Do not pick it up: the tail breaks easily and handling stresses the animal. Photograph the back, the flank, and the head scales, note the place and elevation, and leave the lizard where it is. Colour does not confirm the species — especially in Tusheti and near Tbatana, where D. caucasica is also named.

Overview

What is Daghestanian Rock Lizard

The Daghestanian rock lizard (Darevskia daghestanica) is a harmless rock lizard confirmed in the mountains of north-eastern Georgia. It belongs to the true lizards (Lacertidae). It has no venom and is not dangerous to people. Head–body length in the literature is about 4.4–5.8 cm; the tail is often longer than the body. The 2026 Georgian checklist treats the species as biologically confirmed. Named modern points are Tusheti (barcode) and Akhmeta municipality, Tbatana Mountain (figure). Do not look for it across the whole country: it is not expected on western or southern lowlands. It was often treated as a sister species or subspecies of the Caucasian rock lizard (Darevskia caucasica); it is kept as a separate species.

Last updated

Gallery

Distribution

Where Daghestanian Rock Lizard lives in Georgia

Highlighted regions show where this species has been recorded.

Identification

How to identify Daghestanian Rock Lizard

A small saxicolous Darevskia with a relatively flattened head. In Georgia it is a north-eastern mountain lizard; colour will not separate it from D. caucasica.

  1. The body is slim and flattened, the head relatively narrow and flat, the hind legs long — characters Roitberg used in the contact zone with D. caucasica, not a one-glance photo ID. Dorsal scales are smooth or weakly convex. The Tbatana figures show head scalation and preanal plates; that detail is often invisible in a field snapshot.

  2. The back is often brownish-grey, yellowish-brown, or ashy. A vertebral mark may be two parallel rows of dark specks or a reticulate pattern; sometimes it is faint or absent. Light lateral stripes often stop short of the parietal shields — a character in classical keys, not a guarantee for every individual. Colour does not separate Darevskia species.

  3. It is a small lizard. The lectotype has a 49 mm snout–vent length (Dagestan, Levashi; Doronin 2014). Breeding females in intra-mountain Dagestan measured 43.95–56.20 mm. The tail is often longer than the body; the lectotype tail is damaged and does not give a full length. A measured Georgian series is not published here.

  4. The Caucasian rock lizard (D. caucasica) has a contiguous range on the upper Tergi and is also named at Tbatana. Colour will not tell them apart. D. caucasica often has clearer lateral stripes; in contact, D. daghestanica tends to have more scales around midbody, more ventrals, more femoral pores, and a narrower, flatter head. In the field the safer split is place: Tusheti is named for daghestanica, Truso/Zakagori for caucasica. Derjugin's lizard (D. derjugini) is in the same genus but is a ground-dwelling forest species, not a cliff lizard. The Adjarian rock lizard (D. mixta) belongs to western and central contact zones, not as a Tusheti substitute.

  5. The 2026 Georgian checklist treats the species as biologically confirmed. Named modern points are Tusheti (barcode) and Akhmeta municipality, Tbatana Mountain (figure). Do not look for it across the whole country: it is not expected on western or southern lowlands. Colour does not separate it from the Caucasian rock lizard (D. caucasica); in the field the safer difference is locality.

Quiz

Next: which lizard is it?

Daghestanian Rock Lizard is in the Georgia lizard quiz. Ten field photos, four names — eye practice, not field ID.

Start the quiz

Biology

Habitat, diet, behavior, and conservation

Habitat and range

Two modern Georgian points are named. In Tarkhnishvili and co-authors (2026) a barcode is from Tusheti; the scalation figure is from Akhmeta municipality, Tbatana Mountain. Both are in the mountains of Kakheti. On this atlas map Kakheti reflects those records; it does not mean the species occurs on the Alazani plain or in Kakheti's dry lowlands. Darevsky (1967) and Doronin (2015, 2022) place it on montane rocky, moderately dry ground: cliffs, slopes, and river gorges. The main range is the northern macroslope of the Greater Caucasus from Dagestan to the Darial Gorge in North Ossetia; it enters Tusheti and Azerbaijan to the south. In 1963 Darevsky described an isolated population in the Greater Liakhvi gorge above Java (Dzau), on the road toward the Roki Pass; Doronin and co-authors (2022) confirmed that population in 2021. That isolate is a south-western locality, not a reason to map all of Shida Kartli, so it is not expanded on the map. The 2026 discussion names a contiguous range with D. caucasica on the upper Tergi (Terek), where hybridization is possible — a contact-zone note, not a complete list of villages. Elevation for the caucasica complex in the literature is about 500–3200 m; a measured range for Georgian populations is not published here. Occasional records come from forest without rock outcrops; look first on rock or stone.

Diet

Stomach contents from Georgia have not been published for this species. Caucasian rock lizards in Darevsky's account feed mainly on small invertebrates — spiders, beetles, flies, grasshoppers, ants. The same is expected here, but a Georgian diet has not been measured.

Behavior

A day-active rock lizard. The body is flattened, which helps it enter crevices. Tarkhnishvili and co-authors (2020) treat it as mainly saxicolous but also found away from rocks. Doronin and co-authors (2021) describe a forest site without rocky outcrops. No separate hourly or seasonal calendar has been published for Georgia. It lays eggs. In intra-mountain Dagestan (Kidov and co-authors 2024) breeding females were taken in mid-to-late May; eggs were laid from late May to mid-June, clutch size 1–5, artificial incubation 36–51 days. That is a Dagestan measurement, not a Tusheti calendar. The tail can be shed — a short or regenerated tail does not change the species.

Conservation

IUCN listed the species as Least Concern in 2009 (assessment 2008): the population is presumed large and not declining fast enough for a higher category. That is a global status. It is not on Georgia's 2014 Red List (Resolution No. 190); among Darevskia that list includes Clark's, Dahl's, and the Adjarian rock lizards. The 2026 checklist treats it as biologically confirmed; distribution confidence is medium. Deep genetic differences among populations are described; the checklist does not apply infraspecific names. The Liakhvi isolate is narrow — local pressure there could differ, but there is no separate national assessment. Do not collect animals.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to the most important questions about Daghestanian Rock Lizard.

Yes. The 2026 checklist treats the species as biologically confirmed. That does not mean it occurs throughout the country.

Named modern points are Tusheti and Akhmeta municipality (Tbatana Mountain). A separate isolated population is described in the Greater Liakhvi gorge above Java. Do not look on western or southern lowlands.

No. It has no venom. Do not pick it up — the tail breaks easily.

Colour will not tell you. Use locality and, if possible, scalation. Tusheti is named for this species; Truso for D. caucasica. Near Tbatana either may occur.

It is a small lizard. Head–body length in the literature is about 4.4–5.8 cm. A Georgian series is not measured here.

Small invertebrates are expected. Stomach contents from Georgia have not been published.

No. It is not on the 2014 national Red List. Globally IUCN lists it as Least Concern.